|
Post by Lolli on Aug 26, 2012 1:19:55 GMT
Pride And Prejudice And Zombies by Seth Grahame-Smith. It makes what I consider a boring story into something interesting.
|
|
|
Post by Toadkiller Dog on Sept 11, 2012 5:20:05 GMT
Just finished two New 52 DC trades, both awesome. Batman: The Court of Owls Swamp Thing: Raise Them Bones
Scott Snyder is one of the best things to happen to DC in a while, absolutely fantastic writer.
Working my way now though The Walking Dead Compendium Vol. 1 (Issues 1-48)
When that is done I will be starting Clive Barker's The Thief of Always.
|
|
|
Post by Redemption on Sept 11, 2012 10:39:25 GMT
I started picking up the Batman books at the start of the Court of Owls storyline, and really dug it. though, i got annoyed in issue #12 when they changed artist mid issue, and they're not really similar art styles at all. Still, i'll keep reading as long as Snyder is writing it. Also enjoying Ultimate comics Spider-Man, Always liked the Bendis Ultimate Spider-man books, and i think they've only gotten better since he got to make his own spider-man.
|
|
|
Post by dreggnog on Sept 21, 2012 21:25:25 GMT
Finished Wizard and Glass, which I like 2nd best so far after The Drawing of the Three.
Also read I Know This Much is True, which I liked even though it was depressing and full of bad things. My favorite character was the Monkey.
Am slowly chipping my way through The Stand. Youtube's new ad system makes my computer run super slow, so while I'm waiting for that to work I tend to read little bits of The Stand.
|
|
|
Post by Lolli on Jan 4, 2013 21:21:29 GMT
Angels by Marian Keyes. Sort of slice of life novel with a bit of fame and fortune thrown in.
I gave up reading Pride & Prejudice & Zombies on account of how bland it got.
|
|
|
Post by Blackdog on Jan 23, 2013 19:56:08 GMT
Bought myself all the released books of The Song of Ice and Fire series.
|
|
|
Post by Vio on Jul 26, 2013 18:40:26 GMT
For some light reading: Joseph Pearce's Solzhenitsyn: A Soul in Exile. The prose is almost too easy to digest, falls into poetic imagery a bit too often, and it is more advocacy than objective. But, most of his information is from private interviews with Solzhenitsyn himself--and that is reason enough to read it.
|
|